Network Storage

Last updated 3rd June 2021

Objective

Web PaaS supports internal "storage as a service" to provide a file store that can be shared between different application containers.

The network storage service enables a new kind of mount that refers to a shared service rather than to a local directory. Any application can use both local and/or service mounts, or neither.

Supported versions

Grid
1.0

(This is a reference to a version of our network storage implementation, not to a version of a 3rd party application.)

Define the service

First, declare a new service in the services.yaml file like so:

files:
    type: network-storage:1.0
    disk: 256

This example creates a service named files that is of type network-storage, and gives it 256 MB of storage total.

Declare the mount

Second, add the following entry to your mounts list:

mounts:
    'my/files':
        source: service
        service: files
        source_path: files

This block will declare a writeable mount on the application container at the path my/files, which will be provided by the files service defined above. The source_path specifies the path within the network service that the mount points to. It is often easiest to have it match the name of the mount point itself but that is not required.

Note that you do not need to add a relationship to point to the files service. That is handled automatically by the system.

The application container can now read from and write to the my/files path just as if it were a local writeable mount.

There is a small performance hit for using a network mount over a local mount. In most cases it should not be noticeable. However, high-volume sequential file creation (that is, creating a large number of small files in rapid succession) may see a more significant performance hit. If that is something your application does regularly then a local mount will be more effective.

Multi-application usage

If your project contains more than one application (that is, multiple directories with their own .platform.app.yaml files), they can all use the same network mounts if desired. If the source_path is the same in both .platform.app.yaml files then the files will be shared between both applications, even if the mount location is different.

It is also possible to have one application mount a source_path that is a subdirectory of another application's mount. For example:

app1:

mounts:
    'web/uploads':
        source: service
        service: files
        source_path: uploads

app2:

mounts:
    'process':
        source: service
        service: files
        source_path: uploads/incoming
    'done':
        source: service
        service: files
        source_path: uploads/done

In this example, app1 will have access to the entire uploads directory by writing to web/uploads. app2, by contrast, will have two mounts that it can write to: process and done. The process mount will refer to the same directory as the web/uploads/incoming directory does on app1, and the done mount will refer to the same directory as the web/uploads/done directory on app1.

Worker instances

When defining a Worker instance it is important to keep in mind what mount behavior is desired. Unless the mounts block is defined within the web and workers sections separately, a top level mounts block will apply to both instances. However, local mounts will be a separate storage area for each instance while service mounts will refer to the same file system. For example:

name: app

type: php:7.2

disk: 1024

mounts:
    'network_dir':
        source: service
        service: files
        source_path: our_stuff

    'local_dir':
        source: local
        source_path: my_stuff

web:
    locations:
        "/":
            root: "public"
            passthru: "/index.php"

workers:
    queue:
        commands:
            start: |
                php worker.php

In this case, both the web instance and the queue worker will have two mount points: network_dir and local_dir.

  • The local_dir mount on each will be independent and not connected to each other at all, and they will each take 1024 MB of space.
  • The network_dir mount on each will point to the same network storage space on the files service. They will both be able to read and write to it simultaneously. The amount of space it has available will depend on the disk key specified in services.yaml.

How do I give my workers access to my main application's files?

The most common use case for network-storage is to allow a CMS-driven site to use a worker that has access to the same file mounts as the web-serving application. For that case, all that is needed is to set the necessary file mounts as service mounts.

For example, the following .platform.app.yaml file (fragment) will keep Drupal files directories shared between web and worker instances while keeping the Drush backup directory web-only (as it has no need to be shared). (This assumes a service named files has already been defined in services.yaml.)

name: 'app'
type: 'php:7.2'

relationships:
    database: 'db:mysql'

hooks:
  # ...

web:
    locations:
        '/':
            # ...

disk: 1024

mounts:
    # The public and private files directories are
    # network mounts shared by web and workers.
    'web/sites/default/files':
        source: service
        service: files
        source_path: files
    'private':
        source: service
        service: files
        source_path: private
    # The backup, temp, and cache directories for
    # Drupal's CLI tools don't need to be shared.
    # It wouldn't hurt anything to make them network
    # shares, however.
    '/.drush':
        source: local
        source_path: drush
    'tmp':
        source: local
        source_path: tmp
    'drush-backups':
        source: local
        source_path: drush-backups
    '/.console':
        source: local
        source_path: console

# Crons run on the web container, so they have the
# same mounts as the web container.
crons:
    drupal:
        spec: '*/20 * * * *'
        cmd: 'cd web ; drush core-cron'

# The worker defined here will also have the same 6 mounts;
# 2 of them will be shared with the web container,
# the other 4 will be local to the worker.
workers:
    queue:
        commands:
            start: |
                cd web && drush queue-run myqueue

How can I migrate a local storage to a network storage?

There is no automated way of transferring data from one storage type to another. However, the process is fundamentally "just" moving files around on disk, so it is reasonably straightforward.

Suppose you have this mount configuration:

mounts:
    web/uploads:
        source: local
        source_path: uploads

And want to move that to a network storage mount. The following approximate steps will do so with a minimum of service interruption.

1) Add a new network-storage service, named files, that has at least enough space for your existing files with some buffer. You may need to increase your plan's disk size to accommodate it.

2) Add a new mount to the network storage service on a non-public directory:

mounts:
    new-uploads:
        source: service
        service: files
        source_path: uploads
(Remember the `source_path` can be the same since they're on different storage services.)

3) Deploy these changes. Then use rsync to copy all files from the local mount to the network mount. (Be careful of the trailing /.)

rsync -avz web/uploads/* new-uploads/

4) Reverse the mounts. That is, point the web/uploads directory to the network mount instead:

mounts:
    web/uploads:
        source: service
        service: files
        source_path: uploads
    old-uploads:
        source: local
        source_path: uploads
Commit and push that.  Test to make sure the network files are accessible.

5) Cleanup. First, run another rsync just to make sure any files uploaded during the transition are not lost. (Note the command is different here.)

rsync -avz old-uploads/* web/uploads/
Once you're confident all the files are accounted for, delete the entire contents of `old-uploads`.  If you do not, the files will remain on disk but inaccessible, just eating up disk space needlessly.

Once that's done you can remove the `old-uploads` mount and push again to finish the process.  You are also free to reduce the `disk` size in the `.platform.app.yaml` file if desired, but make sure to leave enough for any remaining local mounts.

Did you find this guide useful?

Please feel free to give any suggestions in order to improve this documentation.

Whether your feedback is about images, content, or structure, please share it, so that we can improve it together.

Your support requests will not be processed via this form. To do this, please use the "Create a ticket" form.

Thank you. Your feedback has been received.


These guides might also interest you...

OVHcloud Community

Access your community space. Ask questions, search for information, post content, and interact with other OVHcloud Community members.

Discuss with the OVHcloud community

In accordance with the 2006/112/CE Directive, modified on 01/01/2015, prices incl. VAT may vary according to the customer's country of residence
(by default, the prices displayed are inclusive of the UK VAT in force).